Teddy bears have been dropped over a house and garden in Lidingö. The house belongs to a Swedish actor that talked to someones unliking in the magazine Slitz (a magazine where the targeted audience are men).
The ” teddy bears” policy has spread, someone has mimicked the event in White Russia some weeks ago. This time a man that has talked and said that a murder at a city jail was the feminists fault. The quote is down below this text. The teddy bears in parashoots where wearing a message that contained the below information, according to the article.
Name has been removed by me, then quote Expressen.se 20120827:
“har uttalat sig i media om att det var feminismens fel att en kvinnlig vakt blev ihjälslagen på jobbet. Det tycker vi är fel på två sätt:
1. Säkerheten på häktet ska inte hänga på att de anställda är bra på att slåss.
2. Man kan inte kategorisera individer utifrån kön på det viset. Hindrar man kvinnor från att ta vissa jobb för att “kvinnor är svaga”, så sorterar man folk på felaktiga grunder.”
I have no idea what the actor was thinking, but maybe he was thinking that if the feminists wouldn´t have driven their agenda and tried to let women in all places in the society… like beeing a guard at a city jail… she wouldn´t have been killed by a prisoner? I think that the first reason is the person that killed. He is responsible for his actions. Then the question is more likely why, he – a man, killed someone. So instead of looking from the wrong perspective we should look at the cause. The prisoner was the one responsible and his life has lead up to him beeing violent. That can be due to many things. I haven´t got a clue about the inprisoned man that killed the female guard. But the feminist have nothing to do with this – that is for sure. So even though I would say it differently I can understand the persons wanting to express themselves with teddy bears. I however think that the perspective by looking at women and their occupations is totally wrong. I would look at the prisoner instead and analyze him. He is the cause and the question is why he has chosen that life.
In todays newspaper Aftonbladet.se we can read about how the White Russia government wants the responsibles for the teddy bear attack to come for investigations to White Russia. However the PR company has now replayed that The president is very much Welcome to visit them instead, in Skåne, Sweden.
I think that is a much better idea. The White Russia government can visit Sweden instead, that is much safer than the other way around for the PR company.
The other EU countries are showing their support to Sweden in the strange strained relationship between White Russia (Belarus) and Sweden, according to DN.se.
Short resume (check the sources in previous articles on this blog):
It all started to move around in the media when there was a teddy bear attack in Minsk. The White Russian government believes the Swedish ambassy was involvd in the affair, but this is rejected as untrue by the Swedes.
Well, then the Swedish ambassador got kicked out from White Russia. Then White Russia decided to close the embassy in Sweden. Well, it´s like two kids playing in the sandbox a old boss of mine would probably say.
Two parties arguing over nothing really. What is dangerous with peaceful actions for freedom of speach? And why would Sweden have to be involved in it? After all Swedes have a long history of democracy compared to other countries. It´s not so strange that individuals get involved and try helping others get freedom too. Maybe White Russia don´t understand this since the Swedish tradition is different then theirs.
This strained relationship is all about differences in oppinions. The parties involved cannot communicate on the same level. Well, I just think that all this is just shit. Nothing more, nothing less. I hope the boys get out of the sandbox and stop behaving like children. It´s all just nonsense.
EU, according to Expressen.se, have talked about a symphaty strike on the White Russian embassies, but if that happens we will have to see.