This is why we should not have nuclear power

The accident at Fukushima the other year during the Tsunami has really made nature suffer. 40 procentage of all Fukushima fish is radioactive and uneatable, according to DN.se.

I happen to think that is so sad. Why should nature suffer from poision because of humans? When we use dangerous chemicals we are making nature suffer. Nuclear is a dangerous substance that we have not learned to control, nor storage safely. Mother nature forces are so much more unpredicatable so we humans cannot create technology around nuclear to cover all incidents that can happen. Can we even make storage last forever until the radioactivity is gone? I think we do not have that knowledge. I think we should use solar power and water power and other ways that do not leave traces in nature forever in a nature catastrofical event. Other type of technology just gets broken and doesn´t poison the nature when it breaks. That is much more sustainable than trying to tame the beast. Nuclear is like a untamable beast. We shouldn´t play God trying to tame something that clearly is not ours to tame. By doing these things we play God on mother nature. We are not God. We are like a parasite. Mother nature and all life suffers because of us humans. I think it´s wrong. Our modern life is wrong in many ways. We should legislate so that nuclear isn´t allowed anymore. And so that chemicals in food isn´t allowed in food anymore, like is is today. If you check the food ingridients they often contain a component named “lecitin”, it can be like soya or something else. Soyalecitin is soya beans boiled in gasoline. They extract the lecitin when boiling the soya beans. A ingredient you do not need if you make the food yourself. So why should ready made food have that? They do it to make the food lack ice crystals I have been told. Stupid. You could see it as you eat gasoline. That is allowed… but nuclear poisoned fish isn´t. I happen to think any stuff like that is as dangerous. Our bodies are not created to eat gasoline.

Source 20121027:

http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/40-procent-av-all-fukushima-fisk-oatlig

Profit makes people lie – The Fukushima owner lied

When people see the chance to make money and see a risk that will decrease the money flow then they seem to keep quite all to often. The money men on the top seem to hide facts. We have seen news over the years. I have been watching news about scandal after scandal all over the world. Usually a majority of scandals involve power and/or money. The more money and/or power at stake the more risk people seem to take.

So having to read that Fukushimas owner lied to the Japanese people about his knowledge in Tsunami threat in DN.se is so sad. This clearly shows that there are other interests than the populations good. Imagine how many have sacrificed their life and health in order to keep the radiation from more people than it did. Imagine that the Japanese company could have prepared and build in safety for a Tsunami. Imagine how many other facts are darkend by millionaires and other nuclear plants and other dangerous companies. Imagine how much the population doesn´t know. Probably a lot.

The DN article says that there was a latent scare for the nuclear plant having to close down when measurement were taken. So what is scary about closing whilst doing good? Profit! Money!

Money is the root of too many problems in the world. Everything has a price tag. Human life has a price tag. There is a limit when human life isn´t much worth… that is when the money profit is very high, the higher the less worth. The more people are worth to sacrifice. Also power can make people sacrifice humans on the way. Money and power can make people cast away morals and do things that a regular Joe or Annes probably wouldn´t consider as long as they have a normal life with no power or big amounts of money. Having to work for a living makes people actually stay in place and not riot. To much unemployment and poverty would actually increase risks for riots. Just see Greece population demonstrating on the streets. See the Spanish. Just see the pirates outside the African coasts.

The population should be enough controlled by just “lagom” amount of money in their pockets. So still think you are not a important piece in this puzzle? You are big part of it and your thoughts can “infect” another person through the written word, the spoken languages and your actions. I would suggest peaceful actions. That means do not break things. Do not hit things or living life. That means no killings.

Peaceful actions are like the teddy bear attack. Peaceful actions are handing out flyers. Peaceful actions do not harm living life, nor nature nor humans or animals. Peaceful means thoughtful actions too. Consider the impact. Consider the consecvenses.

So laws have to be changed. I think that state organs should more evaluate all nature risks to dangerous plants, i.e. nuclear plants, chemical plants etcetera. Then the population shouldn´t be left in the dark. By information people can make companies do what they want. The populations majority should be given options to rule if the options are better for mother earth.

I think that there should be no nuclear anywere in the world. We haven´t even got solutions to keep the waist safe. I mean, I hardly think the containers last 100 000 years… and then… is that enough? We have to little knowledge. We shouldn´t try using the beast until we know how it really works.

Do you wanna read the article about Fukushima, go here (source 20121013):

http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/fukushimas-agare-ville-inte-oroa-folk

Sustainable living for all new buildings and infrastructure

We are all living in a turbulent world full of nature disasters. So why do we continue building things in high risk areas? Why do we still keep building buldings that wouldn´t stand the test of time, nor the forces of nature, and that still use a lot of power?

I am of that oppinion that a building should be able to stand earth quakes, tsunamis, tornados, floodings and so forth. If you build a house in a easily flooded area the house should be placed so it can stand a flood running through it. If you build in an area with risk for earth quakes, it should stand them without falling down. If you have a sea view your house should stand a 5 meter high wave of tsunami. Well, you get it. Buildings should be build to stand the test of time in both design and quality. Buildings should not contain any harmful substances for human, animal or nature. Buildings should be sustainable in fact.

We can build houses that stand wind, water, shaking and so forth. The techniques for that exist too.

So why are we building shit that cannot stand the forces of nature or the test of time or with bad materials dangerous to animals, humans and nature? Greed, money, poverty, time is behind all these reasons. Some cannot afford it, others can but are greedy or indifferent to nature and so on.

All the eco-friendly techniques are available. All houses could be passive houses that need no energy from the grid. We would not need nuclear for regular housing if we just build smart buildings! But there is no incentive to do it. Politicians are all in the hands of the companies, lobbyists when they are creating the rules. Companies don´t wanna pay more money in order to build. They wanna earn money, if the contractor in fact isn´t a eco-friend. I however think all buildings should be eco-friendly and have passive technology. All houses should be built so that they do not need grid energy or nuclear.

Nuclear is a dangerous energy source. We humans cannot handle it. We have no safe way of keeping it until it no longer is dangerous. For every plant we are creating a new problem. The keeping of the nuclear demands safe areas. Areas safe from nature distaters and such. These are not many. We Nordic countries have montains to keep them in, but the mountains are not endless and we do not even have space for all our own nuclear waist.

Still neighbouring countries are building new nuclear plants, what idiots. We need things that need less power. We need less nuclear. We need to figure out how to keep the waist we allready created. We do not need to create new waist. We need more undangerous energy like solar panels, wind turbines and such. Water power is a option, but not in all cases possible due to invasion of fishes natural habits.

So what do we need? All new buildings to be smart, eco-friendly and passive, self sustainable houses. That is the idea for the future.

How can we get it? All the techniques are here, we just need to start building smart! You need to talk, write and spread the word about what you want. If you want it and say it, others can get the knowledge and want it too. Soon all housing could be built smart.

It isn´t so smart to build so poorly like Beijing, China, has built. Their city is now beeing flooded due to heavy raining. It could have been prevented if they had used all there smart technology and planned their building a little bit better to the climat changes and green technology. This is not the first time Beijing in China has flooded, they could have started preventing new floodings. You can read about the flooding in related articles below.

Source 20120722:

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/722643.shtml

http://shanghaiist.com/2012/07/23/deadly_downpour_in_beijing_kills_36.php

http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/dodliga-skyfall-i-peking

A film where they laugh about the flooding happening now in Beijing. Nervous maybe? Source: http://www.youtube.com