Facebook is letting the users phone each other now, at least in Canada, according to Expressen. Since Facebook stores all your posts and so, even the one you deleted are stored for some time (the question how long is yet to be answered). So I am thinking Facebook will store all your calls too… if not now, then later.
Do you really want Facebook to act police, storage manager and censouring manager to your life?
Does this Facebook possiblity open up for something else? Something dangerous (depends on your definition of it)? Do you want Facebook phones? Do you want Facebook to know what you buy and when you buy it? Just pay with Facebook credits… Hmmm…. A Facebook mobile phone would make it possible for Facebook to listen in to your everyday life (mobile phones can be listend into if you didn’t know, even when you are not making a phone call). And a mobile phone would make it possible for Facebook to know where you are. Also today there are already functions in mobile phones that make it possible to pay in the stores with that application technology. A Facebook phone could have that as well… really Facebook could very well be the coproration “ruling” the world. I hope not. There is however one solution. Leave Facebook. Meet people IRL instead.
Read more about Facebook offering calls to users here (20130106):
First post of the year. One of my first images of 2013.
20130101. Copyright livingforum.wordpress.com,
From someone a YouTube a message of happiness for 2013. Some self motivating words for you that reads.
Från någon på YouTube kommer ett budskap av fred och lycka inför 2013. Lite självmotiverande ord till dig som läser.
Snart blir kl.00.00 och nya året i Sverige börjar. Än är det sista dagen på 2012 och några timmar kvar till 2013.
Soon the clock will strike 00.00 and the new year of 2013 starts. But in Sweden it is still 2012 and some hours left until the clock strikes 2013.
I give you a song named Happy new year by ABBA, a Swedish group.
Jag bjuder ikväll på ABBA:s sång Happy new year, vilket känns passande.
Source: ABBA, link: youtu.be/mObouU6xacs
I am wondering how a muslim can take when another muslim says they do not pray enough? How can they take when another muslim comments if they do not wear a veil? How can a muslim accept the fact that other muslims say they are not muslim enough? I am just wondering why the non fundamentalist muslims that live a modern way of life can take the fundamentalist comments? I think that we all need to believe how we believe and you and I shouldn’t judge another persons way of life into God. The relationship between god and women or men is a personal one. We all must believe our own way. Some choose to believe in life on Earth and not holiness other than trying to be in symbiosis with Earth. There is nothing wrong in that. Earth is the first thing we all should be in symbiosis with. After that can other things come, like belief, work and modern or old-fashioned living.
In todays SVD.se at page 5 in Brännpunkt story they have “Är Muhammed heligare än Jesus” printed once more. It is written by a Swedish muslim doctor. He to was judging until he was an educated doctor working at the hospital and didn’t have time anymore to pray five times a day. I think that how often a person praise is totally up to the person itself. It’s between that person and God, no human can judge. If a persons actions are good and caring, who are you or I to judge if that person doesn’t pray? As long as we meet a nice human being living on the right side of the law we should be happy and thankful. There are so many that “follow” the rules of different religions and still do not follow other things in life – like being nice to another human being.
The doctor also asks himself how come Christians do not get furious when someone portraits or makes fun of Jesus whilst muslims start protests? I ask myself the same. In Christianity the religion is between me and God, not you and me. My life on Earth is to my fellow human beings, but my relationship with God is mine, not anyone elses to judge. If someone gets furious about comedies, comic strips and such about their Gods is someone who is not sure of their relationship with God. If you have a solid ground there is no need for you to not let artistic freedom take it place. That doesn’t mean that you need to like the job. But there is no need to start revolts just because someone wrote a book about their God. Still people do. Insecure people do. That is my point of view. Jesus said “Vänd andra kinden till”. Perhaps Muhammed should have written the same? For some things when it comes to religious belief you better turn your cheek. In religion that is. But things that are not even part of religion we need to address. Killing in the name of religion, any religion is just wrong. No God would agree upon you taking a life of another person beacuse they didn’t believe in God the same way as you. You have no rights what so ever to use any religious belief to take another persons life. Well. This is a discussion on its own and difficult to round up in just a simple chapter. So I leave this part of the discussion not totally explained. You can think a little too.
The Swedish muslim doctor in the SVD.se article is asking himself what kind of life he wants his kids to have. I think all of us should ask that. What kind of legacy do we want to give to the world? A world full of hate, distrust and poverty? A world full of crime, unequal life and climate changes to the worse? It is actually up to you. You are big part of this puzzle, you are not distanced from it. You effect everything around you, even if you live in the deepest of woods, far away from cities.
So think about your part. Did you smile to the stranger when you ride the train, subway train or bus the last time? What do you think affects people most a grumpy person or a smiling person? How do you think the two effect that person? Think about it. How does it affect you when someone smiles to you in a nice way? With those words I leave you to think.
And if the Swedish muslim doctor reads this, yes I consider him Swedish, since he lives here in Sweden.
http://www.e-pages.dk/svenskadagbladet/4291/ (paper version of SVD online 20121231)
You most likely will have to pay in order to add new friends to your Facebook account in the future. I can understand that they have to charge the user somehow. So I guess they will become “almost” like the dating sites. On dating sites you often get free membership, but you cannot contact anyone or see the profile on someone that has contacted you. The paying members can contact you… but if you want to reply, you got to pay. Pretty common in fact. So that Facebook starts to charge for you to add new friends isn’t so strange really. Somehow they need to receive money.
According to Aftonbladet.se Facebook is trying the new function out right now. They will probably start with a small amount of users first, the article says. There is a benefit – people are being spammed by people today (or bots) – this will now charge the accounts that spam. If they haven’t money on the account I am guessing they won’t be able to contact people. So you gain a spam protector, but you loose money when you add friends.
According to new science the fatness is caused by a bacteria in the intestines that makes people fat, according to an article in Expressen.se. Rat experiments have shown that rats get fet when injected with the bacteria in question. The science was done since a heavily obese was tested and showed a high amount of enterobacteriaceae, according to the article. The article also says that a special diet decreases the amounts of the bacteria and a person lost 28kg in just 9 weeks.
So now you know, most likely beeing fat is curable in the future. You just eat a special food and then the bacteria decreases. Actually last year I did a rectoscopy and I had some sort of bacteria in my belly that made me have pain and diarréa. Well anyways. After that I lost 15 kg without doing anything. However after 6 months I started gaining again. Perhaps I lost all the above bacteria? I had to cleanse the stomach for the rectoscopy. Perhaps. It makes sense. Perhaps I have that bacteria in my intestines? And perhaps many others too? Who knows?
Learn the secret codes and you will have the all seeing eye. With those promises someone produced this film and someone placed it on YouTube. Well. I want you to think for yourselfs. So therefor I trust that you do. Try to interpret. When you do not understand. Reseach. When you think something sounds unlikely, it probably is. Well. Try to understand what this producer is trying to say. Why are they trying to say it?
Check out the facts. Can you find support on the Internet? In newspapers? If you can: Connect the dots.
Even though some facts are true, their oppinion doesn’t need to be. What do we know to be true? Do we really know? What do we really know? Sometimes we do not have enough facts to know if something is true or false.
The only true things we can say is what we can see. We know who was murdered. Even though I give you this video I do not need to agree upon what they say in this video. My point of view is not in question. Nor is my point of view presented in any way. Since this videos exist you must be aware of them. I think you need to know what people out there believe. When you know, you can do something about it. Maybe produce your own video with your own point of view?
Some facts like burning oil fields causes pollution is however true.
Question everything. Don’t just accept. Think for yourself.
Is their point of view correct? Could it be? Why?
Why does someone produce a video like this? What is the purpose?
Even thought there might be things you do not agree upon, perhaps you will on other things?
In the future the government will indeed be able to hack the hackers I think. Some governments, like China, I allready believe has the capability. I base that on the fact that Google warned some users that their computers where in danger, according to article in the paper the other day. And since I know that NSA has wanted “hackers” to look for jobs at their organisation, so that they have hacker possiblities I am pretty sure of. I have written the sources in earlier articles on this blog. However there are many companies with the resources, like Facebook, that also can do hacking if they want to. I base that on the book Boy Kings that I have read. Well, the Swedish military probably also has this capability according to SVD.se article in todays paper. I am not suprised.
In this cruel world, with this poor technology of ours the governments and companies need the competencies. I am just thinking its all from the wrong side. From my point of origin I think that the technology shouldn’t even make all these things possible. Technology needs to be rethought and rethinked. I hate the fact that technology today is set to “tell all” in default in many cases. Also technology has unique identifiers for many things. I know how to change those, but you need hardware keys. If you are in a manufacturing company you have those hardware keys easy accessable. Well I think that all technology right now can be misused by anyone. It´s sad. It shouldn’t be possible. If we get more integrity it wouldn’t, but hte technologies are going in the oppisite direction. We are getting more survaillance. The more survaillance the more tell all gadgets that put us all at risk. Technology today is designed wrong from the beginning to the end. It should be rethought. Internet should be redesigned. Yes. Utopia? No, you as a inventor can do it. You who has money can do it. You who has the knowledge can invent it. You. I can only ask you to. I think out of the box, but I am not a inventor. I have no expertise in the area of electronics… I am real sorry to say.
Well, want to read the SVD article source? Go here:
Some years ago some scientist got the noble prize for the see through bendable solar cell material, according to Dagens energi.
I see many areas where a see through cell could be implemented. In the windows of buildings would be nice. Imagine beeing able to make the whole house a big solarcell? Wouldn’t that be interesting. The material cotains only carbon. Maybe we can all live in glass houses if we wanted to, houses with total contact with the woods in the future? Well, maybe to many birds would fly into the house? Perhaps it is good if it isn’t just see through material. However I see many possibilities with see through materials.
Want to know more? Read the article here (20121203):