Naturvårdsverket stopped the madness and allowed the Kolmården Zoo to rehabilitate the small seal cubs and then release them back to the wild once they are grown enough to have a good change. Thanks for letting reason override regulations that are stiff and not made for humane actions.
I got the news on Aktuellt today that the cubs could live.
Source:
svt.se 21.00. Aktuellt.
Botkyrka will have muslim prayer callings, according to . The politicians in Botkyrka have decided that it is not their business to decide if they can have prayer callings or not from a mosque, Fittja Mosque. They have no apartments close, since they are located in an industrial area, according to the spokes person for the mosque. They will also lower the sound during some weekend-days he says.
“I want to feel safe and not left outside” a women says in the community in question. Another women doesn’t want it, she doesn’t think everything should be allowed, she says the mosque should be enough.
Botkyrka kommun (community) removes the restriction for prayer callings in Detaljplanen (community detail plan), according to Aktuellt. This means that the Police will decide if a permit is given. They will decide permit for that just as the Ice cream truck.
A politician from SD is against prayer callings and say it is not a must to be able to practise the Islam religion.
To have freedom of religion but that does not mean that we should allow prayer callings automatically, according to a visiting person at Aktuellt. He says it is a religious propaganda and people shouldn’t have to take it. Christianity is not comparable since we have had church bells since the dark ages in Sweden. He says it is propaganda when you want to have something over a larger area with loudspeakers.
Another visiting person at Aktuellt says everyone should have same rules.
I think it is bad for animals. If there happens to be animals they will be disturbed, i.e. birds. So I think more noise is overall bad for the environment and wild life, no matter were it is. Animals are disturbed enough. I also happen to think that we do not need any more noise in our environment. Industrial areas have birds and smaller animals. I think noise also is pollution of the environment. If I have no choise to turn off the sound it is torture from my perspective. Nobody should have to take any more noise in the environment, not humans, nature or the animals. I think the police should say no. Perhaps Naturskyddsföreningen should say how noise affects wild life? Perhaps scientists should say how it affects stress levels and other patterns like sleeping and such. I would like to see if it stresses non muslims and perhaps has a calming effect on believers. Most likely this must have been researched. I hope the police does that research before any allowance. I am hoping they do not allow it, since it is many times each day. I would go crazy having more noise. I have even complained about our road to the community. I am very sensitive to noise. Better to forbid if there is yet no research about noise in our environment (I am thinking there must be sound research).
My suggestion is a radio channel for prayer callings, than anyone can choose to turn that channel on or not. That is much better. Or why not use one dull church bell strike? That isn’t as controversial.
Source:
www.svt.se/aktuellt 21.00, 201301
The accident at Fukushima the other year during the Tsunami has really made nature suffer. 40 procentage of all Fukushima fish is radioactive and uneatable, according to DN.se.
I happen to think that is so sad. Why should nature suffer from poision because of humans? When we use dangerous chemicals we are making nature suffer. Nuclear is a dangerous substance that we have not learned to control, nor storage safely. Mother nature forces are so much more unpredicatable so we humans cannot create technology around nuclear to cover all incidents that can happen. Can we even make storage last forever until the radioactivity is gone? I think we do not have that knowledge. I think we should use solar power and water power and other ways that do not leave traces in nature forever in a nature catastrofical event. Other type of technology just gets broken and doesn´t poison the nature when it breaks. That is much more sustainable than trying to tame the beast. Nuclear is like a untamable beast. We shouldn´t play God trying to tame something that clearly is not ours to tame. By doing these things we play God on mother nature. We are not God. We are like a parasite. Mother nature and all life suffers because of us humans. I think it´s wrong. Our modern life is wrong in many ways. We should legislate so that nuclear isn´t allowed anymore. And so that chemicals in food isn´t allowed in food anymore, like is is today. If you check the food ingridients they often contain a component named “lecitin”, it can be like soya or something else. Soyalecitin is soya beans boiled in gasoline. They extract the lecitin when boiling the soya beans. A ingredient you do not need if you make the food yourself. So why should ready made food have that? They do it to make the food lack ice crystals I have been told. Stupid. You could see it as you eat gasoline. That is allowed… but nuclear poisoned fish isn´t. I happen to think any stuff like that is as dangerous. Our bodies are not created to eat gasoline.
Source 20121027:
http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/40-procent-av-all-fukushima-fisk-oatlig
I was reading some parts of the Bible and I found it bad towards women. I in fact thought of the book as a little bit sexistic. My God is not dicriminating against anyone. My God thinks we are all equal. That´s more than both Islamic Coran and Christian Bible books say. The women is not the property of a man, just wanted to say that. Noone is the property of God or any Devil either.
I think that the confession where the user pledges that Gods will should happen on earth: “ske din vilja så ock på jorden” is very strange. This is against “fri vilja” (free will) that God is supposted to give everyone. Someone might argue that you are willingly giving the “trosbekännelsen” (pledge of faith) if you say it, but then I say we have a free will to believe without giving up our free will too. I really wonder if people haven´t seen these things that go against each other? The Coran is no better.
However I happen to think that people have written the books and not God. In fact, it´s also known to be men (mostly, some women too) that have written the texts. I happen to think the communication to God probably isn´t too good, not for God´s writers nor the profets.
I have less knowledge in the Buddhist religion and Hindu religion scriptures, so I do not know what these religions say about men and women and if all are equal. I however think that in the Buddhist religion they should be equal, but since I haven´t read any scriptures of the Buddhist I do not know. I happen to know about the culture in at least one hindu country and there the women are lower in rank too… if the religion stipulates that is however something I do not know. I can only say what I have seen and experienced. I think, even though the women where lower in rank, that the men seemed to be looking up to their own sposes though. Often they happen to be married off in arranged hindu marriges, at least all many of the ones I have known. It´s the same for the women and men. Many times the womens family has to pay money to the mans family. In my eyes that is unequal. Maybe there are more things that are unequal within the hindu traditions too.
Well, many religions seem to be unequal.
I happen to think the books are history books, with stories about happenings, some true, others visualisazions of what could be and even fantasies. I think they have a lot to teach though. I understand the person that is an atheist after reading some religious scriptures, some things are very difficult to believe in.
Like I have earlier said I have a hard time with things that are inconsistent and go against each other. A lot of religion does just that. There are a lot of inconsisenses within religions. Some religions, like the Devil worshippers, they don´t call themselves Christians, even though they are, they just happen to worship Satan instead of God. Devil worshippers have chosen to follow Satan, but since they believe in Satan, then they believe in the Bible too. Well, there are many things like this that are inconsistent.
The scientologist believe that we are all aliens and that we came to earth. Well, there is also a story behind it. I have read about it, but I do not believe we are aliens. We are all part of this universe. In the bing bang theory we all where just mass, energy and nothingness and then we developed into life on earth. If the cells came with a meteor or not doesn´t seem so important to me. We are living within the eco-system and therefor we are part of earth, even if we behave like parasites. Scientology doesn´t seem to treat non believers equal and that says something about the religion too. All religions that are somehow making others “less important” are on the wrong path, not just scientologists. This is all religions. However many times culture also treats some people less worth and sometimes it´s hard to know where culture is the reason of unequality and where it is religion.
In todays newspaper DN.se I have read about Iranian women forbidden to some higher education due to a old fashioned view that men should be smarter. However the men obviously felt threatend by their women in Iran since they forbid the women to read some courses at the university, according to DN.se. What stupid men. What stupid government. What stupied way of acting. What stupid people to allow the government to do so. What stupid men. What smart women was so stupid she showed the man she was smarter? Ajaj. Unbelievable in 2012 but true. Increadible.
I can understand that an 2000 year old book or a 1600 year old book is discriminating in that world view that was present when they where written, but not in 2012. Iran ´s people should know better. Obviously they don´t.
Source 20120822:
http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/kvinnor-forbjuds-vid-iranska-universitet
In todays Expressen.se we are learned that a black couple were not allowed to marry in a baptist chuch in the Big Western country on the other side of the Atlantic. The church has never had a black couple get married in there. Maybe the owners are rasist? How come they otherwise are not allowed to marry there? The pastor however married the couple in another church.
I did not even know it was allowed to say no due to the colour of the skin in US? So maybe they are still living in the dark ages? I thought apartheid wasn´t allowed? I guess I was wrong.
So are there equal rights in the big country in the west? I am just asking…
Source 20120729:
http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/fargat-par-nekat-giftermal-i-usa/
Related articles (people not beeing allowed to marry):
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/27/wedding-banned_n_1711201.html
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread865641/pg1
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/kentucky-church-bans-interracial-marriage-150009470.html
