Listing sites + GOOGLE = threat to society = dangerous

May I say it? I do not like Google. I hate that regular people are listed on Google because of companies run by people just like i.e. Erik that think they just can list regular people in Sweden just because they can. No other country lists all their people’s addresses and such on Google. Even people with no phone are listed on his site. I hate Sweden because of this. I do not want any addresses to be public on the Internet on search engines like Google. Finding info about people who are not on online communities such as Facebook should be difficult. People like Erik make it to easy. People like him are a threat to people’s integrity.

Erik runs namninformation.se and he also runs another site with the same type of information. I dislike people like him. They are some of the reasons for females and other public figures being threatened online and offline by haters. What he does is dangerous for the Swedish society. Making all contact information easy accessible is dangerous. Dangerous for democracy. Dangerous. So this makes him a dangerous person.

He is a danger with his site to democracy. By listing everything easily journalists and bloggers can get threats. This has recently been in media. If it was harder to get the information about people in Sweden then people who walk in the name of democracy wouldn’t get threats.

Since he thinks he can list people like he wants. Why not list him instead? Feel free to talk, blog and write about this.

Siter som exempelvis namninformation.se utgör en fara för svenska samhället. Här listas även medborgare som inte finns på Internet och som inte ens har telefon. Här får du deras hemadresser. Och i lugn och ro kan galningar sitta hemma på kammaren och skicka anonyma hotbrev till demokratins förespråkare. Det är män som Erik som är farliga för Svenska samhället. Bara för att något går att göra betyder inte att det är lämpligt att göra det. Han listar människor, även de som inte vill, på Internet, utan deras medgivande. Han och andra siter som hans utgör ett hot mot demokratin och svenska samhället.

De som inte vill finnas på Internet ska inte behöva finnas på Internet. Internet är farligt. Det borde vara förbjudet att lista svenska medborgare utan medgivande online. Så enkelt tycker jag det ska vara – förbjud siter som Erik driver. Erik är en del i att det är så lätt att hitta folk och att folk sedan får hot i sina brevlådor osv. Hans hemsidor är ett hot mot demokratin. Han är en del i hotbilden mot demokrati och jämlikhet.

Han är född 1990 den 16:e november. Listar han alla boende i Sverige, kan väl han också listas eller hur?

Jag hittade en bild på honom, så jag har gett er en länk till bilden här nedan, dvs den ligger inte på min sida. Jag har dubbelkollat så det är han och det är det utifrån den information som finns på siten.

I found an image of the guy behind namninformation.se. He also runs the site http://www.nyhetspressen.se. I have double checked the information so I am pretty sure. He has a twitter account twitter.com/erik_stenman .

Is this the Erik Stenman?

Words and questions that should be forbidden in an work interview

I have attended some hundreds of interviews of different types over the years. I have attended many hundreds of work interviews per phone, over questionnaires and in person, after all I have held summer jobs and extra jobs since I was a teenager. Over the years the interviews are a lot. I have also done thousands of interviews over the years, but not in the same area. I have also constructed many questionnaires over the years in other areas. Needless to say I know how to ask questions and how not to ask questions.

I still find myself answering questions on auto pilot in interview situations. But the last interview I just felt that I really did not want to give away my answers after I had written down replies to each question. I just walked out from the group interview. I went home. I thought of the questions really not relevant for any employer to even ask. I wouldn’t mind replaying, since I have no such problems they  tried to find out. But it was the nature of those questions.

If they would have asked the interview questions in person and not me having to put them down paper, perhaps I would have answered the questions on auto-pilot. But I am starting to think I shouldn’t anymore. I need a good reply for NOT replaying. “Why is that relevant?”. I want to get such answers into my autopilot when I feel that the questions are integrity violations.

Really I want Swedish employers to be forbidden to ask questions. In the latest interview they asked, do you have any neurological diagnosis? I am thinking that is none of their businesses. I do not have any of the ADD, ADHD, DAMP and so on, but I am thinking of those that do. And in Neurological many other diseases or disorders also go in. Perhaps many, non relevant health, issues go into this area. Why should an employer even get that information?

Then they asked if the person had a criminal record, if the person had taken drugs. I have no problem answering any of the questions, but I do not think employers should. However I have given this information earlier in employments, but that is when I have been offered the job. They have then made tests before writing the contracts. But in this latest interview you weren’t offered a job, and in those cases why should they even have this information?

It was like they where not going to give jobs to those that most likely had or has issues like they wanted to target. I can understand they want a reliable person, who doesn’t? But there are different ways to do it. They can give the information like:

We will not employ anyone with a criminal record. We will not employ a person that has taken drugs at any time. They can then also write that the person offered the job would have to write a testimony before employment that they say that they have been “good” according to the list. The list can be made long.

However, then it would only be the worker that is really offered the job that has to agree on such information. But in this case the questionnaire was written as a contract, since in the end you needed to sign it. The contract included penalties. I think it is bad to sign a contract before you have even been offered anything or even had salary talk, talk about when and how you would work.

So with all this and some other things I just left the interview, even if it otherwise felt fine. But I have some integrity left inside. I am still human, even though I found myself replaying to each question. But I never handed in the paper work. I just left the place.

I also think that a contract were you have to pay penalties and agree upon those without the reasons specified for breach of contract is overall bad.

Making phone calls on Facebook is like letting the devil listen to your private stuff

Facebook is letting the users phone each other now, at least in Canada, according to Expressen. Since Facebook stores all your posts and so, even the one you deleted are stored for some time (the question how long is yet to be answered). So I am thinking Facebook will store all your calls too… if not now, then later.

Do you really want Facebook to act police, storage manager and censouring manager to your life?

Does this Facebook possiblity open up for something else? Something dangerous (depends on your definition of it)? Do you want Facebook phones? Do you want Facebook to know what you buy and when you buy it? Just pay with Facebook credits… Hmmm….  A Facebook mobile phone would make it possible for Facebook to listen in to your everyday life (mobile phones can be listend into if you didn’t know, even when you are not making a phone call). And a mobile phone would make it possible for Facebook to know where you are. Also today there are already functions in mobile phones that make it possible to pay in the stores with that application technology. A Facebook phone could have that as well… really Facebook could very well be the coproration “ruling” the world. I hope not. There is however one solution. Leave Facebook. Meet people IRL instead.

Read more about Facebook offering calls to users here (20130106):

http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/ring—med-facebook/